“ State of Odisha Vs. Gokula Nanda Jena ” : (2003) 6 SCC 465.
In this case involving Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, law has been laid down by the Apex Court wherein a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was held to be maintainable against an administrative order of the Chief Justice under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
“ State of Orissa Vs. Nityananda Satpathy & Ors ” : (2003) 7 SCC 146.
In this case involving the Orissa Land Reforms Act and Orissa Land Ceilings Act more than 400 acres of government land on the Puri-Konark Marine Drive, which had been unauthorisedly occupied by the trespassers even after the Orissa Estates Abolition Act coming into force, was retrieved by the Apex Court in favour of the State of Orissa.
In “ Mahanadi Coal Fields ”
In this case, the interest of Transport Department of the State of Orissa on the issue as to whether dumpers used in collieries are motor vehicles for the purposes of Orissa Motor Vehicles Taxation Act.
“ Surendra Nath Mohanty Vs. State of Odisha ” : (1999) 5 SCC 238.
In this case, the Apex Court laid down the law that in exercise of the inherent power under Section 482 Cr. PC, the High Court should not compound offences, which are otherwise non-compoundable under the provisions of the Code.
SOME REPORTED JUDGEMENTS OF DELHI HIGH COURT
- G. K. Searle LLC & Ors. v. Maiden Pharmaceuticals Ltd: 2005 (31)PTC 174 (Del)
- Ravinder Sharma v. Mirza Tanners Ltd: 2005 (30) PTC 31 (Del)
- Alberto Culver Company v. R. K. Vijay: 2005 (30) PTC 74 (Del)
- Rajinder Pupneja & Anr v. Bishan Das & Sons and Ors: 2004 (29) PTC 38 (Del)
- Dev Pharmcy v. Nova International: 2003 (27) PTC 395 (Del)
- M/s Arvind Construction Co. (P) Ltd. v. Sales Tax Commissioner, Cuttack.
In this case involving Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, law has been laid down by the Apex Court wherein a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was held to be maintainable against an administrative order of the Chief Justice under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
“ State of Orissa Vs. Nityananda Satpathy & Ors ” : (2003) 7 SCC 146.
In this case involving the Orissa Land Reforms Act and Orissa Land Ceilings Act more than 400 acres of government land on the Puri-Konark Marine Drive, which had been unauthorisedly occupied by the trespassers even after the Orissa Estates Abolition Act coming into force, was retrieved by the Apex Court in favour of the State of Orissa.
In “ Mahanadi Coal Fields ”
In this case, the interest of Transport Department of the State of Orissa on the issue as to whether dumpers used in collieries are motor vehicles for the purposes of Orissa Motor Vehicles Taxation Act.
“ Surendra Nath Mohanty Vs. State of Odisha ” : (1999) 5 SCC 238.
In this case, the Apex Court laid down the law that in exercise of the inherent power under Section 482 Cr. PC, the High Court should not compound offences, which are otherwise non-compoundable under the provisions of the Code.
SOME REPORTED JUDGEMENTS OF DELHI HIGH COURT
- G. K. Searle LLC & Ors. v. Maiden Pharmaceuticals Ltd: 2005 (31)PTC 174 (Del)
- Ravinder Sharma v. Mirza Tanners Ltd: 2005 (30) PTC 31 (Del)
- Alberto Culver Company v. R. K. Vijay: 2005 (30) PTC 74 (Del)
- Rajinder Pupneja & Anr v. Bishan Das & Sons and Ors: 2004 (29) PTC 38 (Del)
- Dev Pharmcy v. Nova International: 2003 (27) PTC 395 (Del)
- M/s Arvind Construction Co. (P) Ltd. v. Sales Tax Commissioner, Cuttack.
TERMS OF USE | SITE MAP | LOCATION
Copyright © 2011, JURIS & JURIS All Right Reserved.